Dana Hatch is founder of The Unfiltered Method, specializing in neuroscience, human behavior, leadership and organizational performance.
getty
For years, organizations have been told they need one strong company culture.
One mission. One set of values. One way of working. It sounds great.
It also ignores the inconvenient reality that the people responsible for preventing financial risk probably shouldn’t operate exactly like the people responsible for taking creative risks.
Yet companies spend enormous amounts of time trying to create one unified culture and then seem genuinely surprised when different departments continue behaving … differently.
Maybe that’s not the problem: Maybe they’re supposed to. The mistake isn’t wanting a unified organization. The mistake is confusing alignment with uniformity.
One company does not mean one way of behaving.
I’ve walked into organizations where leadership proudly tells me, “We really have one culture here.” Then I start talking to the departments.
Sales thinks Operations is where urgency goes to die.
Operations thinks Sales considers “We’ll figure it out later” a legitimate implementation strategy.
Finance would simply like everyone to stop spending money.
Marketing would like Finance to stop ruining everything.
And somehow, all four departments are convinced they’re the only ones keeping the company alive. Same company. Same mission. Very different worlds.
And here’s the thing: They might all be right.
Sales may need to be fast, competitive and responsive.
Finance should probably be cautious, analytical and appropriately suspicious of everyone’s enthusiasm.
Marketing may thrive on experimentation.
Operations may hear the word “experiment” and immediately start calculating everything that could go wrong.
That’s not necessarily dysfunction. That’s specialization. Imagine running an orchestra and deciding cultural consistency means everyone should play the violin. Congratulations. You have achieved uniformity. You have also ruined the orchestra.
Organizations work the same way. Different functions need different rhythms, behaviors and ways of thinking to perform well. The goal isn’t to make everyone behave the same. The goal is to make sure those different behaviors are pulling in the same direction.
Culture needs a spine.
This doesn’t mean every department gets to establish its own tiny sovereign nation and occasionally communicate through diplomatic channels. Although I’ve worked with a few organizations that were alarmingly close.
There still needs to be something holding everyone together. I think of it as the cultural spine. These are the principles that remain nonnegotiable regardless of title, personality or department: integrity, accountability, respect, ownership, excellence and whatever else the organization has decided genuinely defines who it is.
If accountability matters, it matters in Finance and Sales. If respect matters, your highest-producing employee doesn’t receive an exemption because they’re “just intense.”
And if integrity is a company value, it doesn’t become optional when revenue is attached. Those are cultural standards. How they show up, however, may look different.
Accountability in Sales might mean disciplined follow-up and ownership of targets. In Operations, it might mean process adherence and closing loops.
In leadership, it might mean owning the deeply inconvenient possibility that the “communication problem” everyone keeps discussing originated three levels above the people being blamed for it.
Same value. Different behavior.
Dysfunction usually lives at the intersections.
The problem often isn’t the individual cultures. It’s what happens when they collide. Sales thinks Operations moves too slowly. Operations thinks Sales promises things that currently exist only in Sales’ imagination. Marketing wants flexibility. Compliance would prefer everyone stop using the word “flexibility” quite so enthusiastically.
Each function may be behaving exactly as its work requires. But when nobody understands why the other operates differently, difference becomes judgment.
“They’re difficult.”
“They don’t understand urgency.”
“They’re too rigid.”
“They’re reckless.”
And suddenly a structural tension becomes a personality problem. Leadership’s response? Another team-building exercise.
Because apparently nothing resolves competing operational priorities quite like putting 12 adults in a conference room and asking them to build something out of spaghetti.
Instead, ask: Where do our functional cultures need to be different, and where must they align?
Build alignment without creating clones.
Start with the organizational nonnegotiables. Not 14 values nobody remembers. Identify the few principles that should govern behavior everywhere. Then translate them.
Ask each function: What does this value actually look like here?
“Accountability” written on a wall is a concept. “I communicate a missed deadline before someone has to chase me for it” is a behavior. Then identify the intersections.
Where does one team’s strength create friction for another?
Speed can become recklessness. Precision can become paralysis. Autonomy can become isolation. Collaboration can become six meetings about the meeting that should have been an email. Don’t eliminate the differences. Create rules for how the differences work together.
Define who decides. Who needs input. What gets communicated. What happens when priorities conflict. Where flexibility exists and where it doesn’t. And leadership has to stop rewarding behavior that contradicts the culture simply because the person producing it also produces results.
Nothing communicates an organization’s actual values faster than watching leadership repeatedly make exceptions for someone who violates the stated ones.
Your employees notice. They always notice.
One identity. Many functional cultures.
A strong company culture shouldn’t require everyone to think, communicate or operate the same way. It should tell people who we are together while allowing different parts of the organization to determine how we need to operate to do our work exceptionally well.
One organizational identity. Shared nonnegotiables. Different functional cultures. Clear expectations at the intersections. That’s alignment. And alignment doesn’t require sameness.
The strongest organizations aren’t necessarily the ones where everyone operates the same way. They’re the ones where people know what must be shared, what should be different and how those differences fit together.
So stop trying to create one culture where everyone behaves the same. You’re building an organization, not a personality cult. Build one identity strong enough to align many cultures.
Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?
