• About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
Over View - Your Daily News Source
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Politics
    • Science
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Fashion
  • Entertainment
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
  • Tech
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Politics
    • Science
  • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Fashion
  • Entertainment
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
  • Tech
No Result
View All Result
Over View - Your Daily News Source
No Result
View All Result
Home News Science

Improving combination drug trials using ‘definitive screening designs’

admin by admin
November 19, 2022
in Science
0
Improving combination drug trials using ‘definitive screening designs’
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

As developers of high-complexity biologic cocktails, we read with interest the Feature by Strohbehn et al.1 in the December 2021 issue of Nature Biotechnology voicing concerns about the risk of unjustified patents for arguably obvious drug combinations. The current approach to clinical trial design is built for the development of single-agent therapies; it lacks the scalability needed to systematically explore the entire design space of combination therapies. Full factorial trial designs exploring all possible combinations and dosage levels would be infeasible even for the largest biopharmaceutical companies. Against this backdrop, it is not surprising that drug developers focus their efforts on the much smaller set of obvious combinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to Nature+

Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal

Subscribe to Journal

Get full journal access for 1 year

$99.00

only $8.25 per issue

All prices are NET prices.

VAT will be added later in the checkout.

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Additional access options:

  • Log in
  • Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Strohbehn, G. W., Kacew, A. J., Goldstein, D. A., Feldman, R. C. & Ratain, M. J. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1504–1510 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  2. Pharmacy Benefits, V. A. Management Services. Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir (Harvoni®) National Drug Monograph (2014).

  3. Shlay, J. C. et al. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 280, 1590–1595 (1998).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  4. Bosch, J. et al. BMJ 324, 699–702 (2002).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  5. Wilcox, M. H. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 305–317 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  6. Mulangu, S. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 2293–2303 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  7. Muthas, D., Boyer, S. & Hasselgren, C. MedChemComm 4, 1058–1065 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  8. Maddipatla, M. U.S. signs $450 million contract with Regeneron for COVID-19 therapy. Reuters (2020).

  9. Abinader, L. G. U. S. Government funding of Lilly’s LY-CoV555 antibody against COVID-19. Knowledge Ecology International (2020); https://www.keionline.org/34308

  10. Anonymous. Regeneron enters agreement with BARDA on antibody therapy for Ebola. GEN Biotechnol. https://www.genengnews.com/topics/drug-discovery/regeneron-enters-agreement-with-barda-on-antibody-therapy-for-ebola/ (2015).

  11. Box, G. E. P. Improving Almost Anything: Ideas and Essays rev. edn (Wiley-Interscience, 2006).

  12. Fisher, R. A. The Design of Experiments (Oliver and Boyd, 1937).

  13. CDER & CBER. ICH guidance Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development. (2020).

  14. CDER & CBER. ICH Guidance Document Q9 Quality Risk Management. (2006).

  15. CDER & CBER. ICH Guidance Document Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System. (2009).

  16. Palmer, A. C., Izar, B., Hwangbo, H. & Sorger, P. K. Clin. Cancer Res. 28, 368–377 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  17. Jones, B. & Nachtsheim, C. J. J. Qual. Technol. 43, 1–15 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  18. Jones, B. & Nachtsheim, C. J. J. Qual. Technol. 45, 121–129 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  19. Fisher, R. A. J. Ministry Agric. 33, 503–515 (1926).


    Google Scholar
     

  20. Chakraborty, B., Collins, L. M., Strecher, V. J. & Murphy, S. A. Stat. Med. 28, 2687–2708 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  21. Jaynes, J., Ding, X., Xu, H., Wong, W. K. & Ho, C.-M. Stat. Med. 32, 307–318 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  22. Huang, H. & Chen, X. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 157, 107150 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  23. Xiao, Q., Wang, L. & Xu, H. Stat. Med. 38, 236–246 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  24. Abhyankar, M. M. et al. Front. Immunol. 12, 683157 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  25. Zhao, H. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.21.473715 (2022).

  26. Taylor, P. R. et al. Linxian Nutrition Intervention Trials Study Group. Cancer Res. 54(suppl), 2029s–2031s (1994).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  27. Yu, L. X. et al. AAPS J. 16, 771–783 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  28. Scannell, J. W., Blanckley, A., Boldon, H. & Warrington, B. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 191–200 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  29. Paul, S. M. et al. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 203–214 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  30. Pharma Intelligence. Clinical Development Success Rates and Contributing Factors 2011–2020 (2021); https://pharmaintelligence.informa.com/resources/product-content/2021-clinical-development-success-rates

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lumen Bioscience, Seattle, WA, USA

    Michael Dodds, James Roberts & Brian Finrow

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Michael Dodds.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors are employees of Lumen Bioscience.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dodds, M., Roberts, J. & Finrow, B. Improving combination drug trials using ‘definitive screening designs’.
Nat Biotechnol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01521-w

Download citation

  • Published: 18 November 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01521-w

Read More

Previous Post

How do you break a habit?

Next Post

Celebrity boxing sucks. We need CELEBRITY SLAP FIGHTS

Next Post
Celebrity boxing sucks. We need CELEBRITY SLAP FIGHTS

Celebrity boxing sucks. We need CELEBRITY SLAP FIGHTS

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Entertainment
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
  • Lifestyle
    • Fashion
    • Health
    • Travel
    • Food
  • News
    • Business
    • Politics
    • Science
  • Tech

© 2023 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.